Imagine an upcoming event following the 2.0 version described in my previous post. The organizer would announce the speakers present with “a la carte” programs that they will prepare the week before based on the questions submitted by attendees through Twitter or as comments on the organizer’s blog.
The speakers would not bring a presentation or, if they are very fast, they would have been able to prepare a transparency in response to each of the questions presented by their audience. The session would be perfectly adapted to the particular audience and would have responses for all of the attendees’ questions in short answer form - 2 and a half minutes - that would allow the listener to take a large number of concrete answers home with them.
On the other hand, an added advantage, this would avoid the cycles of Q & A at the end of every speaker that allow a few -those searching for their moment of fame- to monopolize the microphone to explain something that doesn’t have anything to do with the given theme but that serves to give them control of the microphone and leave the others without the opportunity to ask concrete and relevant questions.
It’s here for the taking…What are you waiting for?
Translated by Babelic.com

![[lang_es]Entrevista a Rodolfo Carpintier (4)[/lang_es][lang_en]Rodolfo Carpintier Interview (4)[/lang_en]](http://www.dad.es/wp-content/themes/dad/images/uploaded/previews/entrev rodolfo 4.png)

